40 Useful jQuery Techniques and Plugins

April 28, 2010

Over the last year, Smashing Magazine has evolved. We’ve been publishing fewer lists and more in-depth articles about design and Web development. We have invited professionals and high-profile developers to write for us. We’ve been investing more resources in the quality and relevance of our articles. We’ve also explored new formats; and on weekends we’ve been publishing more inspirational pieces, leaving the in-depth articles to weekdays.

We’ve tried our best to fuel the growing appetite of our readers for more advanced articles, but recently we’ve been receiving more requests for carefully selected, useful round-ups. We are not big fans of lists either, but the format is useful and — if the resources are relevant — can be extremely helpful. Therefore, we’ve decided to add a couple of round-ups per month as a bonus to our regular articles. Instead of replacing the main articles, we will add round-ups on top of our regular schedule. If you don’t like round-ups or find them inappropriate, please feel free to skip them. How does this work for you?

In this post, we present 40 useful but obscure jQuery plug-ins that will hopefully help you improve the user experience on your websites. We look forward to your ideas and suggestions in the comments to this post.

Read full article at Smashing Magazine.

Outstanding Photos with Partial Color | Webdesigner Depot

April 26, 2010

Partial color allows a designer to hone in on a particular part of an image and enhance it with color.

This makes the images really “pop” and this technique can be used for many purposes. For example, in advertising or corporate designs, features of a product can be highlighted that the eye may not normally be drawn to.

When used for artistic photography, non-focal points of the image can be colored in order to draw attention to them. Whatever the use, this fresh technique is popping up all over print design and on the web, and we’ve gathered some of the best examples here for you to enjoy.

Offtopic: E-mailing to Posterous from Google Reader’s mobile interface does not work as expected. For some vague reason, when I shared the same article yesterday, it had only included my e-mail signature in the post. :(

Outstanding Photos with Partial Color

April 23, 2010

Best regards, 

Andre Kuzmicheff 
Creative Director
Glowing Mind, LLC 

How to Crowdfund your Startup

April 23, 2010
Are you going to crowdfund your startup?

via Carsonified » Blog by Kieran Masterton on 4/22/10


In November 2009, my business partner and I successfully Crowdfunded a business designed to provide independent filmmakers with an alternative method of film distribution, OpenIndie. The result of our month-long campaign was over $12,400 to bootstrap our company, a good amount of press interest and a built-in audience and user base for our site.

What is Crowdfunding?

Before discussing the pros and cons of Crowdfunding I should explain a little about how the process actually works. The most important thing to considering when Crowdfunding your venture is that this isn’t like taking investment. The process can take many forms, and just like taking investment, won’t be right for everyone. That said, here’s the most common model being used by everyone from startups and non-profits to artists, musicians and filmmakers:

An individual or organisation states that they need X amount of money to fund their venture. This venture can be anything, from a cupcake shop to an independent feature film; and the amount of money can be a small part or all of the total cost of the venture. The individual or organisation then uses their existing networks to leverage the crowd, that’s you, to donate money to their venture in return for a reward.

Often this reward is directly related to the venture being funding, so it could be a batch of cupcakes or a credit at the end of someone’s film; but equally it could simply be a very small thank you for your contribution. I recently came across someone who successfully crowdfunded enough money to pay for the hull of her ship that she needed to circumnavigate the globe.

In return for a small contribution she promised a postcard from a random location on her travels delivered to your door. As you can see, this isn’t investment in the traditional sense, in fact rule number one of Crowdfunding is that you don’t offer a percentage of your venture as a reward. Rather this process is something akin to patronage by a different name. However, there is an important difference between Crowdfunding and patronage that I will explain using the example of my own experience.

Pre-Selling your Product to Fund your Business

OpenIndie is the brainchild of filmmaker Arin Crumley and myself, a Developer with an academic background in film. The concept is to turn the existing model of film distribution on its head. Instead of Hollywood pushing out content, users of OpenIndie can pull screenings of films to them by requesting films to screen in their area.

This is a model that Arin developed for his film Four Eyed Monsters (2005) and it has since been used by indies like Age of Stupid (2009) and even big studios like Paramount with Paranormal Activity (2007).

During our discussions about the amount of work involved in building a site of this kind it soon became clear that this wasn’t going to be the sort of project I could achieve on my own during evenings and weekends. At the time, I was working as a Developer for a large British magazine publisher which left me very little time for personal projects.

The decision was quickly made that we needed some form of bootstrap funding, approximately $10,000 to fund three or four months of fulltime development and hosting costs for the time it takes to monetize the site. We weren’t after serious investment because we knew we had the skills in-house to build and promote the site.

Likewise, because of the nature of the site we felt that anyone interested in investing would probably have a vested interest in the world of film distribution and we didn’t want anyone to have influence over the direction of the site.

Around that time Kickstarter.com launched. Kickstarter is designed to allow anyone with an idea to get the money needed to make that idea a reality. However, they impose a few constraints. You have to ask for a fixed amount of money, and you only get that money if you raise all of it within a maximum of a three month period. $1 short of a $10,000 goal and nobody’s credit card gets charged and you don’t get a cent – a fact that focuses the mind somewhat.

In our case we worked extremely hard to leverage our existing networks, Twitter in particular. When it comes to Twitter indie film is a small world and it became clear that it was important for us to connect with the filmmakers that would want to use our service. Be as open as possible, allow them to ask us questions and emphasise that we’re building a site for them and with them.

We had to make the decision very early on about rewards and one of our first decisions was to ask for a fixed number of donations at a fixed rate. That way our progress is measurable. We asked for 100 filmmakers to give $100 a piece to be the first 100 individuals to add their film to the site, a target that at the time we considered ambitious.

Crowdfunding Options

There are a whole range of options for Crowdsourcing your funding, some sites focus on more creative endeavours while others are more suited to a broader range of projects. The site that I think is really setting the standard for crowdfunding is Kickstarter.com.

We used them to fund OpenIndie and we chose them for two reasons. First, Arin had already had success in funded a $3,500 campaign to pay for some expenses on his latest feature film. Second, Kickstarter was flexible enough to accommodate funding a business as opposed to just creative ventures. That said, here’s a couple of great options if you’re considering Crowdfunding.

IndieGoGo

IndieGoGo.com

Originally designed to help filmmakers fund their work the projects on IndieGogo now go far beyond just filmmaking. The site is more than flexible enough to be used to fund creative endeavours and businesses of all kinds. A great feature of this site is the ability to add team members to your campaign. This can be really useful because often a successful venture is about the team that you’ve built around an idea. It is important to show those backing your business that the idea is in good hands and it helps when leveraging multiple people’s networks.

IndieGoGo takes 9% of the final money raised as a fee for using the service but also offers a 5% cash reward for anyone who hits their goal, which is nice and effectively means your fee is only 4%. The site is also international friendly meaning that anyone from anywhere in the world can use the site to fund their venture.

Kickstarter

Kickstarter.com

Not the first Crowdfunding site to hit the net, but certainly currently one of the best. Kickstarter has a number of different categories for projects. These include the likes of Technology, Music, Games and Food. With such diverse categories it’s simple to fit your business idea into Kickstarter’s model. One major disadvantage of Kickstarter is that it is currently only open to project creators who have a US bank account. This is a restriction of Amazon Payments which it uses to take your backer’s pledges.

Anyone from anywhere in the world can back your campaign, but only those with a US bank account can set up a campaign. Last time I spoke to the guys at Kickstarter about this issue they assured me that Amazon are looking to rectify this problem, but for now, it’s a fairly major barrier for use for those outside the United States. Kickstarter takes 5% of the final money raised as a fee for using the service plus around 3% for Amazon credit card processing fees.

GrowVC

Growvc.com

GrowVC takes a similar model to Kickstarter and IndieGoGo, and applies it strictly to business startups, but with a couple of important distinctions. First, in my opinion this isn’t true Crowdfunding because it seems that with GrowVC funders get a share in the business, a fact that makes me think this is more like transparent angel investment.

I should note however that GrowVC do not actually claim to be a Crowdfunding site though they are applying some of the same principles to a similar problem. Secondly, instead of losing a percentage of your total monies raised, as a project creator, you pay monthly for the service based on the amount you’re attempting to raise.

Prices range from $20 a month to $140 for an unlimited funding account. They also charge funders a monthly fee for the privilege of investing and while this could be a barrier to investing it also ensures that investors are serious about what they’re doing. In short, a very different option, but a valid one nonetheless.

Ulule

And finally, one other site worthy of note but not yet launched is Ulule.com which appears to be focused upon a broader range of projects and creative endeavours. They have yet to announce their pricing structure but I think this one has the potential to be great for entrepreneurs. Plus, their promotional video explains very effectively how Crowdfunding works:

What Worked?

The beauty of this approach was that we were effectively pre-selling our product and we were putting a value upon that product. We were stating what OpenIndie would offer, how it would work and how soon they would be able to access the site. This set the expectations of our users at a realistic level and meant they understood that we weren’t going to be able to provide this as a free service.

It also meant that because those 100 filmmakers had faith in our idea, enough to back our campaign, they also acted as advocates for us and referred other filmmakers by retweeting and blogging about what we were doing.

Thanks to their faith and generosity I was able to leave my fulltime job, work for three solid months developing the site and launch it on March 1st in time for them to start promoting their films and building audience demand. We get to build our site and the filmmakers get the service they want.

What didn’t Work?

It would be wrong to say that Crowdfunding is the golden ticket to funding your business because it isn’t. Crowdsourcing takes a lot of work and it relies on you having a pre-existing audience or being able to build one very quickly. In our case Arin was already a known figure within the indie film world which attracted a small amount of press attention and a flurry of activity on Twitter when we first announced our campaign.

However, it took four weeks of tweeting, blogging, answering questions, doing interviews and, quite honestly, pimping the hell out of our campaign page to secure our $10,000. We funded approximately 14 hours before our deadline and went on to raise just shy of a further $2,500 making our total $12,413.

Now that you’ve popped your virtual champaign cork and celebrated the massive achievement of raising the money you need to build your baby, it’s time to deliver the rewards you promised. In our case some of those were easy. We offered anyone giving $15 or more a copy of the Four Eyed Monsters Soundtrack on CD or MP3, for example.

However, some rewards were harder to fulfil, for instance every filmmaker who signed up was promised a one hour consultation with Arin to discuss how best to build an audience for their film. We’re still working our way through the 100 filmmakers. Scheduling so many consultations across so many time zones with filmmakers schedules being so full and Arin’s time being limited has been a challenge. We continue to offer this service as part of our filmmaker sign up, but we now work with another expert in the field of audience building to fulfil these consultations.

Five Golden rules of Crowdfunding

I can not tell you if my experience of Crowdfunding is the norm, but here are a few things I have learnt from funding OpenIndie:

1. Ask for what you need

Make a budget and be sure that you can do what you need for the sum you’re setting as your goal. The most important thing when Crowdfunding is being sure that you can deliver on your promises.

2. Be realistic

This one takes its lead from number one. Can you actually do this? Do you have the skills? Are you sure? Don’t promise what you can’t deliver and never under deliver on your promises.

3. Set a unit price and set a total unit goal

People really respond to A) being part of an exclusive group and B) the need to reach a goal which isn’t financial. We asked for 100 filmmakers to donate $100. You could ask for 100 Magicians or 50 Accountants or 200 used car salesmen. Whatever your niche, focus upon it and ask yourself what appeals to that niche.

4. Pre-sell your product

Presumably your business has a product. Ours is film profiles, yours might be perfume, books or bookkeeping. Whatever it is, offer those people buying into your exclusive club that product if the campaign successfully funds. Everyone who donates $100 or more gets our exclusive funders special edition perfume, for example.

5. Be open

Transparency is straight out of the Web Business 101 classroom but it really can’t be said enough. Be open and honest with those giving you money and nothing will creep up and bite you on the ass.

Is Crowdfunding for you and your business?

It is very important to note that Crowdfunding is not a funding solution for everyone and it does not work with all business models. The process also has its critics who claim that it isn’t sustainable and that business startups aren’t charities so why are they asking for handouts? These are both valid criticisms. Certainly at OpenIndie we have found that Crowdfunding is not a sustainable source of revenue.

Since our successful campaign in November we have twice attempted to raise similar amounts by the same means, but neither attempt was successful. This was for two reasons. First, I think that we launched our second campaign too early. People wanted to see the site built and get to interact with it before deciding whether to donate yet more money to its development.

And, second, we are a small team of two and during development neither Arin or I had the time needed to push the second campaign in the way we did the first. In retrospect a second campaign probably wasn’t the right move. It’s called Kickstarter for a reason. That said, I think if you have a really niche product, and you have the audience needed to make a Crowdfunding campaign work it can be a brilliant means by which to see your ideas become reality. It has certainly been a fantastic experience for OpenIndie.

With respect to the concern that businesses are not charities and should not be asking for handouts, I see can this point of view and actually agree. This is why I advocate the pre-sale of goods in return for funding. By demonstrating your product and offering those investing an exclusive item in return for the help you need to get started you are not asking for a handout.

You are asking for them to have faith in you and yes, you could fail to produce the product you offered and your backers would walk away with nothing. However, if your backers know this up front and are still happy to put their hands in their pockets, and a successful business is born out of this act of faith, then I think Crowdfunding has the potential to bring a massive amount of ideas to life.

Finally, I’d like to ask you if you’ve had any experience of Crowdfunding either a business or creative endeavor? Or if you’ve come across a new Crowdfunding site why not let us know in comments?

How to Crowdfund your Startup

April 23, 2010
Are you going to crowdfund your startup?

via Carsonified » Blog by Kieran Masterton on 4/22/10


In November 2009, my business partner and I successfully Crowdfunded a business designed to provide independent filmmakers with an alternative method of film distribution, OpenIndie. The result of our month-long campaign was over $12,400 to bootstrap our company, a good amount of press interest and a built-in audience and user base for our site.

What is Crowdfunding?

Before discussing the pros and cons of Crowdfunding I should explain a little about how the process actually works. The most important thing to considering when Crowdfunding your venture is that this isn’t like taking investment. The process can take many forms, and just like taking investment, won’t be right for everyone. That said, here’s the most common model being used by everyone from startups and non-profits to artists, musicians and filmmakers:

An individual or organisation states that they need X amount of money to fund their venture. This venture can be anything, from a cupcake shop to an independent feature film; and the amount of money can be a small part or all of the total cost of the venture. The individual or organisation then uses their existing networks to leverage the crowd, that’s you, to donate money to their venture in return for a reward.

Often this reward is directly related to the venture being funding, so it could be a batch of cupcakes or a credit at the end of someone’s film; but equally it could simply be a very small thank you for your contribution. I recently came across someone who successfully crowdfunded enough money to pay for the hull of her ship that she needed to circumnavigate the globe.

In return for a small contribution she promised a postcard from a random location on her travels delivered to your door. As you can see, this isn’t investment in the traditional sense, in fact rule number one of Crowdfunding is that you don’t offer a percentage of your venture as a reward. Rather this process is something akin to patronage by a different name. However, there is an important difference between Crowdfunding and patronage that I will explain using the example of my own experience.

Pre-Selling your Product to Fund your Business

OpenIndie is the brainchild of filmmaker Arin Crumley and myself, a Developer with an academic background in film. The concept is to turn the existing model of film distribution on its head. Instead of Hollywood pushing out content, users of OpenIndie can pull screenings of films to them by requesting films to screen in their area.

This is a model that Arin developed for his film Four Eyed Monsters (2005) and it has since been used by indies like Age of Stupid (2009) and even big studios like Paramount with Paranormal Activity (2007).

During our discussions about the amount of work involved in building a site of this kind it soon became clear that this wasn’t going to be the sort of project I could achieve on my own during evenings and weekends. At the time, I was working as a Developer for a large British magazine publisher which left me very little time for personal projects.

The decision was quickly made that we needed some form of bootstrap funding, approximately $10,000 to fund three or four months of fulltime development and hosting costs for the time it takes to monetize the site. We weren’t after serious investment because we knew we had the skills in-house to build and promote the site.

Likewise, because of the nature of the site we felt that anyone interested in investing would probably have a vested interest in the world of film distribution and we didn’t want anyone to have influence over the direction of the site.

Around that time Kickstarter.com launched. Kickstarter is designed to allow anyone with an idea to get the money needed to make that idea a reality. However, they impose a few constraints. You have to ask for a fixed amount of money, and you only get that money if you raise all of it within a maximum of a three month period. $1 short of a $10,000 goal and nobody’s credit card gets charged and you don’t get a cent – a fact that focuses the mind somewhat.

In our case we worked extremely hard to leverage our existing networks, Twitter in particular. When it comes to Twitter indie film is a small world and it became clear that it was important for us to connect with the filmmakers that would want to use our service. Be as open as possible, allow them to ask us questions and emphasise that we’re building a site for them and with them.

We had to make the decision very early on about rewards and one of our first decisions was to ask for a fixed number of donations at a fixed rate. That way our progress is measurable. We asked for 100 filmmakers to give $100 a piece to be the first 100 individuals to add their film to the site, a target that at the time we considered ambitious.

Crowdfunding Options

There are a whole range of options for Crowdsourcing your funding, some sites focus on more creative endeavours while others are more suited to a broader range of projects. The site that I think is really setting the standard for crowdfunding is Kickstarter.com.

We used them to fund OpenIndie and we chose them for two reasons. First, Arin had already had success in funded a $3,500 campaign to pay for some expenses on his latest feature film. Second, Kickstarter was flexible enough to accommodate funding a business as opposed to just creative ventures. That said, here’s a couple of great options if you’re considering Crowdfunding.

IndieGoGo

IndieGoGo.com

Originally designed to help filmmakers fund their work the projects on IndieGogo now go far beyond just filmmaking. The site is more than flexible enough to be used to fund creative endeavours and businesses of all kinds. A great feature of this site is the ability to add team members to your campaign. This can be really useful because often a successful venture is about the team that you’ve built around an idea. It is important to show those backing your business that the idea is in good hands and it helps when leveraging multiple people’s networks.

IndieGoGo takes 9% of the final money raised as a fee for using the service but also offers a 5% cash reward for anyone who hits their goal, which is nice and effectively means your fee is only 4%. The site is also international friendly meaning that anyone from anywhere in the world can use the site to fund their venture.

Kickstarter

Kickstarter.com

Not the first Crowdfunding site to hit the net, but certainly currently one of the best. Kickstarter has a number of different categories for projects. These include the likes of Technology, Music, Games and Food. With such diverse categories it’s simple to fit your business idea into Kickstarter’s model. One major disadvantage of Kickstarter is that it is currently only open to project creators who have a US bank account. This is a restriction of Amazon Payments which it uses to take your backer’s pledges.

Anyone from anywhere in the world can back your campaign, but only those with a US bank account can set up a campaign. Last time I spoke to the guys at Kickstarter about this issue they assured me that Amazon are looking to rectify this problem, but for now, it’s a fairly major barrier for use for those outside the United States. Kickstarter takes 5% of the final money raised as a fee for using the service plus around 3% for Amazon credit card processing fees.

GrowVC

Growvc.com

GrowVC takes a similar model to Kickstarter and IndieGoGo, and applies it strictly to business startups, but with a couple of important distinctions. First, in my opinion this isn’t true Crowdfunding because it seems that with GrowVC funders get a share in the business, a fact that makes me think this is more like transparent angel investment.

I should note however that GrowVC do not actually claim to be a Crowdfunding site though they are applying some of the same principles to a similar problem. Secondly, instead of losing a percentage of your total monies raised, as a project creator, you pay monthly for the service based on the amount you’re attempting to raise.

Prices range from $20 a month to $140 for an unlimited funding account. They also charge funders a monthly fee for the privilege of investing and while this could be a barrier to investing it also ensures that investors are serious about what they’re doing. In short, a very different option, but a valid one nonetheless.

Ulule

And finally, one other site worthy of note but not yet launched is Ulule.com which appears to be focused upon a broader range of projects and creative endeavours. They have yet to announce their pricing structure but I think this one has the potential to be great for entrepreneurs. Plus, their promotional video explains very effectively how Crowdfunding works:

What Worked?

The beauty of this approach was that we were effectively pre-selling our product and we were putting a value upon that product. We were stating what OpenIndie would offer, how it would work and how soon they would be able to access the site. This set the expectations of our users at a realistic level and meant they understood that we weren’t going to be able to provide this as a free service.

It also meant that because those 100 filmmakers had faith in our idea, enough to back our campaign, they also acted as advocates for us and referred other filmmakers by retweeting and blogging about what we were doing.

Thanks to their faith and generosity I was able to leave my fulltime job, work for three solid months developing the site and launch it on March 1st in time for them to start promoting their films and building audience demand. We get to build our site and the filmmakers get the service they want.

What didn’t Work?

It would be wrong to say that Crowdfunding is the golden ticket to funding your business because it isn’t. Crowdsourcing takes a lot of work and it relies on you having a pre-existing audience or being able to build one very quickly. In our case Arin was already a known figure within the indie film world which attracted a small amount of press attention and a flurry of activity on Twitter when we first announced our campaign.

However, it took four weeks of tweeting, blogging, answering questions, doing interviews and, quite honestly, pimping the hell out of our campaign page to secure our $10,000. We funded approximately 14 hours before our deadline and went on to raise just shy of a further $2,500 making our total $12,413.

Now that you’ve popped your virtual champaign cork and celebrated the massive achievement of raising the money you need to build your baby, it’s time to deliver the rewards you promised. In our case some of those were easy. We offered anyone giving $15 or more a copy of the Four Eyed Monsters Soundtrack on CD or MP3, for example.

However, some rewards were harder to fulfil, for instance every filmmaker who signed up was promised a one hour consultation with Arin to discuss how best to build an audience for their film. We’re still working our way through the 100 filmmakers. Scheduling so many consultations across so many time zones with filmmakers schedules being so full and Arin’s time being limited has been a challenge. We continue to offer this service as part of our filmmaker sign up, but we now work with another expert in the field of audience building to fulfil these consultations.

Five Golden rules of Crowdfunding

I can not tell you if my experience of Crowdfunding is the norm, but here are a few things I have learnt from funding OpenIndie:

1. Ask for what you need

Make a budget and be sure that you can do what you need for the sum you’re setting as your goal. The most important thing when Crowdfunding is being sure that you can deliver on your promises.

2. Be realistic

This one takes its lead from number one. Can you actually do this? Do you have the skills? Are you sure? Don’t promise what you can’t deliver and never under deliver on your promises.

3. Set a unit price and set a total unit goal

People really respond to A) being part of an exclusive group and B) the need to reach a goal which isn’t financial. We asked for 100 filmmakers to donate $100. You could ask for 100 Magicians or 50 Accountants or 200 used car salesmen. Whatever your niche, focus upon it and ask yourself what appeals to that niche.

4. Pre-sell your product

Presumably your business has a product. Ours is film profiles, yours might be perfume, books or bookkeeping. Whatever it is, offer those people buying into your exclusive club that product if the campaign successfully funds. Everyone who donates $100 or more gets our exclusive funders special edition perfume, for example.

5. Be open

Transparency is straight out of the Web Business 101 classroom but it really can’t be said enough. Be open and honest with those giving you money and nothing will creep up and bite you on the ass.

Is Crowdfunding for you and your business?

It is very important to note that Crowdfunding is not a funding solution for everyone and it does not work with all business models. The process also has its critics who claim that it isn’t sustainable and that business startups aren’t charities so why are they asking for handouts? These are both valid criticisms. Certainly at OpenIndie we have found that Crowdfunding is not a sustainable source of revenue.

Since our successful campaign in November we have twice attempted to raise similar amounts by the same means, but neither attempt was successful. This was for two reasons. First, I think that we launched our second campaign too early. People wanted to see the site built and get to interact with it before deciding whether to donate yet more money to its development.

And, second, we are a small team of two and during development neither Arin or I had the time needed to push the second campaign in the way we did the first. In retrospect a second campaign probably wasn’t the right move. It’s called Kickstarter for a reason. That said, I think if you have a really niche product, and you have the audience needed to make a Crowdfunding campaign work it can be a brilliant means by which to see your ideas become reality. It has certainly been a fantastic experience for OpenIndie.

With respect to the concern that businesses are not charities and should not be asking for handouts, I see can this point of view and actually agree. This is why I advocate the pre-sale of goods in return for funding. By demonstrating your product and offering those investing an exclusive item in return for the help you need to get started you are not asking for a handout.

You are asking for them to have faith in you and yes, you could fail to produce the product you offered and your backers would walk away with nothing. However, if your backers know this up front and are still happy to put their hands in their pockets, and a successful business is born out of this act of faith, then I think Crowdfunding has the potential to bring a massive amount of ideas to life.

Finally, I’d like to ask you if you’ve had any experience of Crowdfunding either a business or creative endeavor? Or if you’ve come across a new Crowdfunding site why not let us know in comments?

Showcase Of Web Design In Netherlands

April 23, 2010
Impressive showcase of web design works from Low Countries.

via Smashing Magazine Feed by Edgar Leijs on 4/22/10



Smashing-magazine-advertisement in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
 in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands  in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands  in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

The Netherlands, also known as the “Low Countries,” is a small, crowded, muddy piece of land through which a few big important rivers fortunately run. In this country, you can find coffee shops, wooden shoes, tulips, windmills and a lot of water.

And everything is rather small! Well, at least most of the architecture is. How cute is that? But it’s also the land that brought the world many great painters, famous architects, and excellent graphic, fashion and interior designers. We all know Rembrandt, Van Gogh, Mondriaan, Rietveld, Koolhaas, Escher, Droog Design and Viktor & Rolf, don’t we?

Spinawards-mom in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Dutch Web Design: Spin Awards

[By the way: The network tab (on the top of the page) is updated several times a day. It features manually selected articles from the best web design blogs!]

State Of Affairs

Can the Dutch be proud of its Web design community? Is it capable of producing great websites? Has the community earned a place in Web design land, or is Dutch Web design still in its infancy?

A Virtual Discussion About Dutch Web Design

I invited a diverse group of Dutch Web agencies and freelancers to discuss the state of Dutch web design.

  • Harald Dunnink, creative director at Momkai
  • Wimer “Monokai” Hazenberg, art director at Booreiland
  • Rogier Strobbe, Frish Design Studio
  • Erik Leutscher, Eldesign
  • Maarten Kleyne, creative designer
  • Woud Hobbelink, Designphunk
  • Rose Calis, Toko Rose
  • Christian Annyas, freelance Web and graphic designer
  • Mattijs Bliek, Helium Workx
  • Michel Branco Bio, Branco Creative Studio
  • Ewout van Lambalgen, illustrator and Web designer
  • Erik van Nieuwburg, Rumbling Skies
  • Rolf Coppens, Grrr
  • Jens Kanis, designer and developer
  • Jonno Riekwel, Jonnotie
  • Nelleke van der Maas, Designed By Nelleke
  • Caspar Hardholt, MediaCT
  • Marten de Jongh, creative freelancer

Can Certain Web Design Characteristics Be Called Typically Dutch?

Erik van Nieuwburg: “There is a very typical Dutch school of architecture, photography and graphic design. But in the field of Web design, I do not see a typical Dutch identity. Perhaps this has to do with the international nature of the Web.”

Maarten Kleyne: “I do not think you can pin this down as, ‘This is pure Dutch Web design so let’s hang it on our wall next to the wooden shoes, tulips, cheese and other things.’”

Harald Dunnink: “A certain clarity and simplicity characterizes Dutch design. For myself, I try to bring the traditional conception of creativity, aesthetics and clarity of Dutch design into the digital domain.” Christian Annyas has a similar opinion. Also, Woud Hobbelink agrees and feels that sometimes, Dutch Web designers seem reluctant to experiment. The products are usually somewhat stiff.

Rolf Coppens adds: “Simplicity and conceptual working are characteristics you often find in our Web design.” Caspar Hardholt has a similar opinion: “I think Dutch Web design is less complicated and very natural. As the Dutch saying goes, ‘Just act normal — that’s crazy enough.’ And I guess we don’t like stock photography. We make it more personal.”

Brandrepublic in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Brandrepublic

Erik van Nieuwburg: “Dutch Flash projects are more about being functional than about having rich animations, at least when compared to many English-language projects.”

Rogier Strobbe: “If I may pick out one element that the Dutch have been known for, it is surely typography. We have some of the best typographers in the world. Think of Gerard Unger, Martin Majoor and Jos Buivenga. Of course, the Web has never been known for its rich typography, but let’s hope that @font-face and initiatives such as Typekit will change that and take typography to the next level in the coming years.”

Rose Calis adds: “The big Dutch Web design agencies still control both the market and the appearance of most designs on the Web. Freelancers spend a lot of time on the latest trends, as their designs often show. But I think the Netherlands is running a bit behind.”

Vpro in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Dutch Web Design: VPRO

Christian Annyas nods approvingly: “It is hardly innovative. With the exception of a few.”

Jens Kanis: “You’ll see that we communicate more formally to our customers, while many US companies go for the informal approach. Look at Google and Apple. They talk to their customers differently than we do to ours.”

Marten de Jongh: “Best of all worlds!? The Netherlands is a multicultural society, and that’s what you see in its designs. Brazil is known for its illustrative qualities, the North Americans own the drop-shadow and use a lot of glass effects, and the French are more artistic. I think the Dutch have a little of everything.”

Michel Branco reflects: “Dutch designers characterize themselves as ‘unconventional’ and not mainstream. Perhaps an appropriate term for Dutch web design would be ‘unconventional Web design.’”

Is There A Dutch Web Community?

Wimer Hazenberg: “There is a Dutch design world, I think. Whether or not we can identify with it is another question — not with the establishment in any case, like Lost Boys.”

Jens Kanis: “It differs according to the person. I do operate in a Dutch Web design community, but I am mainly focused on the international scene.”

Mattijs Bliek: “Yes, there is one, but you have to search for it. My experience is that it is found mainly in the Amsterdam area, which certainly appears to be a creative hot spot in the Netherlands. I find that being around other designers who challenge and inspire you is really good.”

Erik Leutscher: “Web design is an Internet profession, which means that all you need to become a successful Web designer today can be found on the Web. I don’t think a ‘Dutch’ Web community exists.”

Werkplaatstypo in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Werkplaatstypografie

Nelleke van der Maas: “I’m not sure. I don’t meet up regularly with other Web designers, apart from the new year’s drinks organized by creative recruitment agencies like Aquent. But because I freelance for advertising agencies in Amsterdam, I often see the same people at events, conferences and the Spin Awards.”

Ewout van Lambalgen: “I’ve never noticed anything. I work as a freelancer, and I mainly follow international websites.”

Jonno Riekwel: “There isn’t a huge Web community in the Netherlands. Not that I know of anyway. I regret not having a community or organization that allows Web designers to come together more often, as Fronteers does for front-end developers.”

Harald Dunnink: “I prefer to be around people who love their profession, who are ambitious and creative. This could be a creative developer, illustrator, artist or designer, but also a baker.”

Erik van Nieuwburg: “The Flash community is a true ‘community,’ with much cohesion, because the group of people who make a living off Flash isn’t a very big one. I think it’s a great community, where you can often get immediate help with complex issues. At conferences, like Flash on the Beach and Flash in the Can, you can meet up with Flash celebs like Keith Peters and Mario Klingeman, drink a beer or two and jabber away with them!”

What Does A Web Designer Or Agency Need To Be Eye-Catching?

Jonno Riekwel: “Plenty of design companies are in the Netherlands, but you really stand out when you’re transparent and do good things. Like Mangrove, which organized an evening to watch Objectified. Agencies should do stuff like that more often.”

Jens Kanis: “It can be difficult to earn your spot in the Dutch design industry, but it is certainly possible. Invest descent time in good and clear communication with your customers, which will eventually pay off. Be honest with your clients, even if the message isn’t positive or pleasing.”

Erik van Nieuwburg: “If you are building a blog, for instance, you could see how WordPress does it, but you could also think about how the user would want it exactly. A great example is Nalden, where the established concept of a ‘blog’ was completely flushed down the drain.”

Nalden in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Nalden

Wimer Hazenberg: “Do not accept the Web 2.0 style blindly. Go back to the basics, and from there you can create something that serves someone’s needs. We all know the basic styling tricks. It is more about finding a fitting solution to the issue at hand.” Ewout van Lambalgen agrees: “Don’t look too much to what other designers do, because it will only affect your own designs. (Un)consciously, you would always be copying from others, and then you wouldn’t stand out from the crowd.”

Caspar Hardholt: “You will be successful if you make your customers more successful.”

Matthijs Bliek: “To be completely honest, I do not like the term Web designer, because it limits you. Mike Kus puts it well in his article on 24 Ways: ‘A key factor in creating something original and fresh for the Web is to stop thinking in terms of Web design. Don’t design for the Web, just design.’ Do something crazy!”

Christian Annyas: “90% of all designers in the Netherlands are typical mediocre designers. The world of Web design primarily consists of rehashes of old recipes.”

Rose Calis, who has just started freelancing: “First, put everything you do on a list before you officially start as a freelancer. A beautiful and technically well-built website is not enough. A customer might give up on a poorly drafted briefing that is full of technical jargon. Be unique and refreshing, and above all keep investigating. You’re never too old to learn.”

W139 in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
W139

Nelleke van der Maas: “A portfolio that not only looks beautiful but shows that the designer has thought about usability. Attention to detail makes me notice someone. Have they put effort into designing their own icons, for instance? Or have they used nice typography, unusual navigation or any new technologies?”

Woud Hobbelink: “Experimenting. Freaking out with your Photoshop/Illustrator document!” Erik Leutscher agrees: “Dare to violate the rules. You might screw up a project once, but learn from your mistakes and become a better designer.” And Harrald Dunnink puts it succinctly: “Talent, the will to work hard, a healthy kind of dissatisfaction and a computer.”

Maarten Kleyne: “Sometimes innovation can be found under the hood of a design and can be more innovative than the design itself.”

Matthijs Bliek has these words of wisdom: “Take up new technology such as HTML5 and CSS3.”

Conclusions

The Dutch are individualists. Despite having created a big pile of outdated websites, this small community is getting its creative act together. Web designers from the Low Countries generally love clear design, incline towards minimalism and prefer to work conceptually.

Given the rich graphic history of the Netherlands, there is still much honor to gain on the Web. Hopefully, @font-face will accelerate this development.

Heeftstijl in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands
Heeftstijl.nl

There is no distinct Dutch Web community, considering the Dutch are individualists and internationally oriented. The industry is fragmented, unprotected and not well represented. The only Web design blog that tries to give the Dutch community a face and contribute to a sense of high-quality design for the country is Heeftstijl. Perhaps it is worthy of the term “Dutch Web design.”

Certainly, inspiration can come from many different sources. Erwin Olaf is highly valued, as is poet Wim T. Schippers. Dutch designers refer to Bas Ording (Apple OS X), Momkai, Delta (Boris Tellegen), the late Kioken Inc., Jos Buivenga and Mediamonks as sources of inspiration.

And Now You Decide, With a Showcase

Adobe User Group

Aug in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Jens Kanis

Jenskanis in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Iwit

Iwit in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Dawn

Dawn in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

G-Star Next Raw Reporter

G-star-reporter in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

They

They in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

N8

N8 in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Grafisch Lyceum Rotterdam

Glr in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Kunsthal

Kunsthal in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Vingino

Vinginio in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Mode Arnhem

Modearnhem in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Annyas

Annyas in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Jochem Myjer

Jochemmeyjer in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Hanazuki

Hanazuki in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Sapph Lingerie

Sapph in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Creative Connection

Creativeconnection in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Badabingdesign

Badabing in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Dewerkelijkheidverzinjeniet

Dewerkeleijkheid in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Design.nl

Design in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

VenhoevenCS

Venhoeven in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Matias Jansen

Matiasjansen in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

PVDA

Pvda in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Doelstelling2

Doelstelling2 in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Wehkamp

Wehkamp in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Unga Toys

Ungatoys in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Joods Monument

Joodsmonument in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Dutch Design Agencies Showcase

Momkai

Momkai in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Achtung

Achtung in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

MediaMonks

Mediamonks in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Postmachina

Postmachina in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Booreiland

Booreiland in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Onstuimig

Onstuimig in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Grrr

Grrr in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Fabrique

Fabrique in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Refunk.com

Refunk in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Eldesign

Eldesign in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

De Internetjongens

Internetjongens in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Creative Monkeys

Creativemonkeys in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Adena

Adena in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Biqini

Biqini in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Designer Showcase

Designed By Nelleke

Nelleke in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Jeroen Homan

Jeroen-homan in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Jeroen van Eerden

Jeroenvaneerden in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Sjoerd Dijkstra

Sjoerddijkstra in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Annyas

Annyas in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Frish

Frish in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Both

Both in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Helium Workx

Heliumworkx in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

MKleyne

Mkleyne in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Jonnotie

Jonnotie in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Toko Rose

Tokorose in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Wij Zijn Rood

Wijzijnrood in Showcase Of Web Design In The Netherlands

Special thanks to Maarten Kleyne, Momkai, Frish, Eldesign, Designphunk, Toko Rose, Christian Annyas, Helium Workx, Branco Creative, Iwit, Booreiland, Rumbling Skies, Grrr, Jens Kanis, Nelleke, MediaCT, Marten de Jongh and Jonno Riekwel.

Related Posts

You may be interested in the following related posts:

(al)


© Edgar Leijs for Smashing Magazine, 2010. | Permalink | 36 comments | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble on StumbleUpon! | <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=@tweetmeme%20@smashingmag%20Reading%20'Showcase%20Of%20Web%20Design%20In%20The%20Netherlands'%20http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2010/04/22/showcase-of-web-design-in-netherla…” title=”Tweet us!”>Tweet it! | Submit to Reddit | Forum Smashing Magazine
Post tags: ,

Volcano Eruption in Island by Lucas Jackson

April 18, 2010

Great image that clearly suggests how small and insignificant we are compared with forces of nature.

Flowdock Tries to Help Turn Conversation to Knowledge

April 7, 2010

flowdock_screenshot.jpg

Designed for groups, Flowdock attempts to address a new kind of information overload, the one that intensified when social media tools began to be adopted by exponentially more people. The theory is that by tagging bits of the conversation, they are made discreet and retrievable based on folksonomy.

Use examples include agile development and handling to-dos.

Flowdock is out of private data and you the public is invited to try it.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.